Gift Card
your bag is empty
Images
sale
WOMEN SHORT-SLEEVE RELAX DRESS (WITH PADDING)
Details
/us/en/women-short-sleeve-relax-dress-with-padding-416963.html
$
19.90
$
5.90
Variations
Additional Information
Product Detail
Materials & Care
Lounge dress with padding in the chest. Perfect for relaxing at home.
- Roomy enough for relaxing, while still looking slim and sleek.
- With removable chest pads.
- Newly updated with repositioned pads for greater comfort.
- The thickness of the pads has been revised so it can be worn by itself with confidence.
- The position of the slot for removing the pads was changed to make it easier to find.
- Stitches have been added to keep the pads in position after wearing and washing.
You asked, we listened! See what's updated from last year from here.
WOMEN SHORT-SLEEVE RELAX DRESS (WITH PADDING) is rated
out of
5 by
4.
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Pam from
Comfortable and stylish
This dress was so comfortable and kept me looking good while I did my laundry and shopping. I love this dress and the little slit on the side was perfect for my fast walking.
Date published: 2019-07-19
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Celinelisem from
Cute as a button!
Material is light and comfy, but not revealing; I opted to remove the padding underneath as I preferred to use my own. Pairs great with plain white sneakers. It has a little slit on the side which was not visible in the published photos, but I’m overall happy with it.
Date published: 2019-07-11
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Cuicui from
Great features
I bought it for lounge wear and it solved the biggest problem that all lounge wear have.... as it is padded! And only in front ! Nothing in back, not the same as the bra inner wear. It’s soooo perfect for lounge wear. Have bought 3 already.
Date published: 2019-06-08
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Socalgal from
Cute dress
Dress is super comfy. I like my dresses a little loose so I ordered as S instead of my usual XS and it fits as expected. The cups hit at the right level and it looks good, but it is loose around my chest. It is comfortable that way, but not what I was expecting.
Date published: 2019-02-23
